Accessibility links

1
Dewis iaith

Agenda a Chofnodion

Lleoliad: Committee Rooms 2/3, Civic Offices Angel Street Bridgend CF31 4WB

Cyswllt: Michael Pitman  Business Administrative Apprentice

Eitemau
Rhif Eitem

117.

Ymddiheuriadau am Absenoldeb

Derbyn ymddiheuriadau am absenoldeb gan Aelodau.

 

Cofnodion:

None

118.

Cymeradwyo Cofnodion pdf eicon PDF 66 KB

I dderbyn am gymeradwyaeth y Cofnodion cyfarfod y 08/05/2018 a 05/06/2018

Dogfennau ychwanegol:

Cofnodion:

PENDERFYNWYD:Cymeradwyo Cofnodion cyhoeddus cyfarfod yr Is-bwyllgor Trwyddedu (A) ar 08 Mai 2018 a 05 Mehefin 2018, yn wir ac yn gywir.

119.

Cais am Drwyddedu Cerbyd Llogi Preifat pdf eicon PDF 89 KB

Cofnodion:

Cyflwynodd Pennaeth y Gwasanaethau Rheoliadol a Chyfreithiol adroddiad yn gofyn i'r Is-bwyllgor ystyried cais am gymeradwyo trwydded ar gyfer Cerbyd Llogi Preifat.

 

Cyflwynwyd y cais gan Forge Travel Limited, i drwyddedu Volkswagen Transporter, rhif cofrestru cerbyd GF16 GBO, fel cerbyd llogi preifat ar gyfer 8 person. Roedd gan y cerbyd berchennog blaenorol ac roedd wedi’i gofrestru gyda'r DVLA am y tro cyntaf ar 30 Mawrth 2016.

 

Gohiriwyd y cyfarfod am ychydig er mwyn i’r Aelodau archwilio’r cerbyd.

 

Ar ôl ailddechrau’r cyfarfod, dywedodd yr Arweinydd Tîm (Trwyddedu) wrth aelodau bod y car wedi gwneud 32,324 o filltiroedd hyd yn hyn. Dywedodd fod y cerbyd y tu allan i’r Polisi Cerbyd Llogi Preifat a gymeradwywyd gan y Pwyllgor Trwyddedu. Nid oedd y cerbyd yn hygyrch i gadeiriau olwyn, ond roedd canllawiau polisi penodol mewn perthynas â thrwyddedu Cerbydau Llogi Preifat a oedd y tu allan i ganllawiau'r polisi a amlinellwyd ym mharagraff 4.4 yr adroddiad.

 

Er gwybodaeth i’r aelodau, rhoddwyd hanes triniaeth y cerbyd a gyflwynwyd ar 16 Chwefror 2018, ac roedd y cerbyd, ar yr adeg honno wedi gwneud 32,087 o filltiroedd. Roedd y cerbyd wedi cael ei archwilio'n ddiweddar gan Swyddog Gorfodi ar 20 Gorffennaf a gadarnhaodd mai 44,276 o filltiroedd oedd ar y cloc bryd hynny. Roedd y cerbyd mewn cyflwr da heb unrhyw ddiffygion na phroblemau amlwg.

 

PENDERFYNWYD:  Ystyriodd yr Is-bwyllgor y cais am drwyddedu Rhif Cofrestru Cerbyd GF16 GBO yn Gerbyd Llogi Preifat.

 

Nododd aelodau fod y cais y tu allan i’r Polisi Trwyddedu ym mharagraff 2.1 oherwydd oedran y cerbyd.

 

Nododd aelodau ymhellach fod y Polisi ym mharagraff 2.2 yn caniatáu eithriadau mewn amgylchiadau arbennig, a rhoddwyd manylion o’r rhain ym mharagraff 2.4 y Polisi.

 

Ar ôl archwilio’r cerbyd, roedd yr Is-bwyllgor yn teimlo bod y cerbyd yn arbennig o ran ei gyflwr y tu mewn a thu allan, ac o ran ei rinweddau diogelwch.Felly cymeradwyodd yr Is-bwyllgor y drwydded.

120.

Cais am Drwyddedu Cerbyd Llogi Preifat pdf eicon PDF 90 KB

Cofnodion:

Cyflwynodd Pennaeth y Gwasanaethau Rheoliadol a Chyfreithiol adroddiad yn gofyn i’r Is-bwyllgor ystyried cais am gymeradwyo trwydded ar gyfer Cerbyd Llogi Preifat.

 

Cyflwynwyd y cais gan Forge Travel Limited, i drwyddedu Volkswagen Transporter, rhif cofrestru cerbyd GJ16 XJZ, fel cerbyd llogi preifat ar gyfer 8 person. Roedd gan y cerbyd berchennog blaenorol ac roedd wedi’i gofrestru gyda'r DVLA am y tro cyntaf ar 24 Mawrth 2016.

 

Gohiriwyd y cyfarfod am ychydig er mwyn i’r Aelodau archwilio’r cerbyd.

 

Ar ôl ailddechrau’r cyfarfod, dywedodd yr Arweinydd Tîm (Trwyddedu) wrth aelodau bod y car wedi gwneud 32,401 o filltiroedd hyd yn hyn. Dywedodd fod y cerbyd y tu allan i’r Polisi Cerbyd Llogi Preifat a gymeradwywyd gan y Pwyllgor Trwyddedu. Nid oedd y cerbyd yn hygyrch i gadeiriau olwyn, ond roedd canllawiau polisi penodol mewn perthynas â thrwyddedu Cerbydau Llogi Preifat a oedd y tu allan i ganllawiau'r polisi a amlinellwyd ym mharagraff 4.4 yr adroddiad.

 

Er gwybodaeth i’r aelodau, rhoddwyd hanes triniaeth y cerbyd a gyflwynwyd ar 16 Chwefror 2018, ac roedd y cerbyd, ar yr adeg honno wedi gwneud 32,087 o filltiroedd. Roedd y cerbyd wedi cael ei archwilio'n ddiweddar gan Swyddog Gorfodi ar 20 Gorffennaf a gadarnhaodd mai 44,276 o filltiroedd oedd ar y cloc bryd hynny. Roedd y cerbyd mewn cyflwr da heb unrhyw ddiffygion na phroblemau amlwg.

 

PENDERFYNWYD:  Ystyriodd yr Is-bwyllgor y cais am drwyddedu Rhif Cofrestru Cerbyd GF16 GBO yn Gerbyd Llogi Preifat.

 

Nododd aelodau fod y cais y tu allan i’r Polisi Trwyddedu ym mharagraff 2.1 oherwydd oedran y cerbyd.

 

Nododd aelodau ymhellach fod y Polisi ym mharagraff 2.2 yn caniatáu eithriadau mewn amgylchiadau arbennig, a rhoddwyd manylion o’r rhain ym mharagraff 2.4 y Polisi.

 

Ar ôl archwilio’r cerbyd, roedd yr Is-bwyllgor yn teimlo bod y cerbyd yn arbennig o ran ei gyflwr y tu mewn a thu allan, ac o ran ei rinweddau diogelwch.Felly cymeradwyodd yr Is-bwyllgor y drwydded.

121.

Eitemau Brys

I ystyried unrhyw eitemau o fusnes y, oherwydd amgylchiadau arbennig y cadeirydd o'r farn y dylid eu hystyried yn y cyfarfod fel mater o frys yn unol â Rhan 4 (pharagraff 4) o'r Rheolau Trefn y Cyngor yn y Cyfansoddiad.

 

Cofnodion:

Dim

122.

Gwahardd y Cyhoedd

Nid oedd y cofnodion ac adroddiadau sy'n ymwneud â'r eitemau canlynol yn cael eu cyhoeddi, gan fod eu bod yn cynnwys gwybodaeth eithriedig fel y'i diffinnir ym Mharagraffau 14 a 16 o Ran 4 a Pharagraff 21 o Ran 5, Atodlen 12A, Deddf Llywodraeth Leol 1972, fel y'i newidiwyd gan Orchymyn Llywodraeth Leol

(Cymru) 2007 (Mynediad at Wybodaeth) (Amrywio).

 

Os, yn dilyn cymhwyso'r prawf budd y cyhoedd yn yr Is-Bwyllgor yn penderfynu yn unol â'r Ddeddf i ystyried yr eitemau hyn yn breifat, bydd y cyhoedd yn cael eu gwahardd o'r cyfarfod yn ystod ystyriaeth o'r fath.

 

 

 

Cofnodion:

PENDERFYNWYD: Dan Adran 100A (4) Deddf Llywodraeth Leol 1972 fel y’i diwygiwyd gan Orchymyn Llywodraeth Leol (Mynediad at Wybodaeth) (Amrywiad) (Cymru) 2007, gwahardd y cyhoedd o’r cyfarfod wrth ystyried yr eitemau canlynol gan eu bod yn cynnwys gwybodaeth sydd wedi’i heithrio fel y diffinnir ym Mharagraff 12 Rhan 4 a/neu Baragraff 21 Rhan 5 Atodlen 12A y Ddeddf.

                                    

Yn dilyn cyflwyno’r prawf budd cyhoeddus penderfynwyd, yn unol â’r Ddeddf y cyfeirir ati uchod, ystyried yr eitemau canlynol mewn preifat, gyda’r cyhoedd wedi’i wahardd o'r cyfarfod, gan yr ystyriwyd ym mhob achos sy’n ymwneud â’r eitemau, y byddai budd cyhoeddus o gynnal yr eithriad yn drech na budd y cyhoedd mewn datgelu’r wybodaeth, gan y byddai’r wybodaeth yn niweidiol i’r ymgeiswyr y soniwyd amdanynt.       

123.

Cymeradwyaeth Cofnodion wedi’u Eithrio

I dderbyn am gymeradwyaeth y Cofnodion eithrio cyfarfod y 05/06/2018

 

Cofnodion:

RESOLVED: That the exempt Minutes of a meeting of the Licensing Sub-Committee (A) dated 05 June 2018, be approved as a true and accurate record.

124.

Ceisiadau i Gymeradwyo Trwyddedau

Cofnodion:

David Charnock

21 Heol Llansantffraid Road

Sarn

Bridgend

 

The Team Manager (Licensing) asked the applicant if the details in the report were correct to which he confirmed they were. The applicant was then asked if there were any outstanding convictions or penalties to which he replied no.

 

She stated that the reason for the hearing was that the convictions triggered the policy at 2.9 for dishonesty.

 

She then asked Mr Charnock to give some background on the two offences listed in the report dating 12/05/2015 and 18/12/2015 respectively.

 

The applicant stated that his father had Alzheimer’s so he was home most of the time. He wasn’t working full time but was working as a taxi driver. He was under a lot of stress due to his father’s illness and therefore made false claims for benefits.

 

He said he currently pays back £100 a month and that is the most he can pay as he explained he is struggling to get more work. He was told that he owed £17,000 in total and is not sure how much he has paid back so far.

 

A Member asked if he currently held any positions of trust to which he replied no. He did recently hold a position in RPM, Bridgend and was in charge of the grinding room and there was a lot of money around him. He also explained that he regularly helped an elderly lady do her shopping as she has Alzheimer’s and can sometimes struggle. He also said that Jackson Cabs has accepted him provisionally as a taxi driver.

 

A Member asked how DWP found out what he was claiming was too much. The applicant stated that he made a query for an amount to the DWP and was then found to be overpaid. The applicant said he didn’t believe it should have been £17,000 as he was only aware of £5,000.

 

A Member asked how he challenged this if he believed it to be wrong. The applicant responded saying he already had challenged it but the DWP had not got back to him.

 

The Sub-Committee adjourned to make a decision.

 

RESOLVED: The Sub Committee considered the application and the conviction relating to fraud. The applicant explained that due to his father’s illness he was under a large amount of stress and therefore made false claims for benefits.

 

The Sub-Committee on hearing evidence against the applicant decided that they could not find any reason to depart from the policy and because of the seriousness of the offences determined that he was not a fit and proper person to hold a licence in accordance with the policy and refused the application.

125.

Gwrandawiad Disgyblu ar gyfer Gyrwyr Tacsi Presennol

Cofnodion:

Michael Andrew Langdon

26 Mountain View

Lewistown

Ogmore Vale

Bridgend

 

The Team Manager (Licensing) presented a report detailing the reason for the disciplinary hearing. She stated that Mr Langdon disclosed the information of the conviction on his own accord by telephone. Appendix A of the report related to the other vehicle involved and states their conviction relating to the incident

 

Mr Langdon was asked to give his account of the circumstances that had led to his conviction.

 

He explained that he was parked in a taxi rank near the Wilkinson’s store in Bridgend town centre. A car that he believed to be a blue Vauxhall Zafira, drove past his taxi knocking the wing mirror off.

 

Mr Langdon, after realising the other driver wasn’t going to stop chased him up towards Aldi and around the one way system to the front of the police station. He drove into the bus lane, in front of the other driver and stopped. He stepped out of the car and shouted at the driver. The other driver told him that if he had a problem then he should report it in the police station. Mr Langdon did so and during this, the police looked at CCTV footage of the incident. The police told Mr Langdon that he was caught on CCTV driving recklessly and was therefore charged for it.

 

A Member asked if he was speeding in which he replied no. He was then asked why he did not seek legal advice and pleaded guilty if he believed that he didn’t do anything wrong. He replied saying he didn’t want to risk anything going wrong and thought that pleading guilty would be the safer choice for him to make.

 

The Sub-Committee adjourned to make a decision.

 

RESOLVED: The Sub Committee considered the application and the conviction relating to driving a vehicle without due care and attention. Mr Langdon explained that he only pursued the other driver involved because he did not stop after knocking his wing mirror off.

 

The Sub-Committee noted that Mr Langdon had been a taxi driver since 1998 and had not appeared before the Sub-Committee previously on any disciplinary matters. Taking this in to consideration, the Sub-Committee decided to issue a first written warning, which would be on his record for 18 months.

 

Meeting closed at 11:40am

126.

Datgan Buddiannau

Derbyn datganiadau o ddiddordeb personol a rhagfarnol (os o gwbl) gan Aelodau / Swyddogion yn unol â darpariaethau'r Cod Ymddygiad Aelodau a fabwysiadwyd gan y Cyngor o 1 Medi 2008.

 

Cofnodion:

Dim

 

Chwilio A i Y

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z