Accessibility links

1
Dewis iaith

Agenda a Chofnodion

Lleoliad: Committee Rooms 2/3, Civic Offices Angel Street Bridgend CF31 4WB

Eitemau
Rhif Eitem

120.

Datganiadau o Fuddiant

Derbyn datganiadau o ddiddordeb personol a rhagfarnol (os o gwbl) gan Aelodau / Swyddogion yn unol â darpariaethau'r Cod Ymddygiad Aelodau a fabwysiadwyd gan y Cyngor o 1 Medi 2008.

 

Cofnodion:

Datganodd y Cynghorydd Brian Jones ddiddordeb anfanteisiol yn eitem 9 - Gwrandawiad Disgyblu'r Gyrrwr Tacsi Presennol gan ei fod yn adnabod yr ymgeisydd a gadawodd yr ystafell pan oedd y cais yn cael ei ystyried.

121.

Derbyn y Cofnodion pdf eicon PDF 203 KB

I dderbyn am gymeradwyaeth y Cofnodion cyfarfod y 18/12/2018

 

Cofnodion:

PENDERFYNWYD: I dderbyn cofnodion y cyfarfod a gynhaliwyd ar 18fed Rhagfyr 2018 fel rhai cywir.

122.

Cais i Drwyddedu Cerbyd Hurio Preifat pdf eicon PDF 263 KB

Cofnodion:

Cyflwynodd Pennaeth Gwasanaethau Cyfreithiol a Rheoli adroddiad a oedd yn gofyn i'r Is Bwyllgor ystyried cais i ganiatáu trwydded am Gerbyd Hurio Preifat.

 

Gwnaethpwyd y cais gan Peyton Travel i drwyddedu Renault Trafic, rhif cofrestru M24 PEY fel cerbyd hurio preifat i gludo 8 unigolyn.

 

Roedd y cerbyd yn un ail law a chafodd ei gofrestru gyda'r DVLA am y tro cyntaf ar 24 Mehefin 2015. Er gwybodaeth i'r Aelodau, darparwyd cefndir gwasanaeth dyddiedig 15 Medi 2016 gyda chofnod milltiredd o 30,997 ac ar 19 Awst 2018 gyda chofnod milltiredd o 59,445.

 

Gohiriwyd y cyfarfod am gyfnod byr i ganiatáu i Aelodau archwilio'r cerbyd. Wedi i'r cyfarfod ailddechrau, nododd yr Aelodau gofnod milltiredd o 69,043 a bod y cerbyd yn ymddangos mewn cyflwr rhagorol.

 

PENDERFYNWYD:

 

Ystyriodd yr Is-Bwyllgor y cais i drwyddedu'r cerbyd â'r rhif cofrestru M24 PEY fel Cerbyd Hurio Preifat.

 

Nododd aelodau bod y cais yn mynd y tu hwnt i'r Polisi Trwyddedu ym mharagraff 2.1 oherwydd oedran y cerbyd.

 

Nododd aelodau bod y Polisi ym mharagraff 2.2 yn caniatáu i'r rheol gael ei llacio mewn amgylchiadau eithriadol, ac mae enghreifftiau o'r rhain wedi'u manylu ym mharagraff 2.4 y Polisi.

 

Wedi archwilio'r cerbyd, barn yr Is-Bwyllgor oedd bod y cerbyd yn eithriadol o ran ansawdd y tu mewn yn ogystal â'r tu allan, a'i rinweddau diogelwch. Felly, rhoddodd yr Is-Bwyllgor ganiatâd i drwyddedu'r cerbyd.

123.

Materion Brys

I ystyried unrhyw eitemau o fusnes y, oherwydd amgylchiadau arbennig y cadeirydd o'r farn y dylid eu hystyried yn y cyfarfod fel mater o frys yn unol â Rhan 4 (pharagraff 4) o'r Rheolau Trefn y Cyngor yn y Cyfansoddiad.

 

Cofnodion:

Dim

124.

Gwahardd y Cyhoedd

Nid oedd y cofnodion ac adroddiadau sy'n ymwneud â'r eitemau canlynol yn cael eu cyhoeddi, gan fod eu bod yn cynnwys gwybodaeth eithriedig fel y'i diffinnir ym Mharagraffau 14 a 16 o Ran 4 a Pharagraff 21 o Ran 5, Atodlen 12A, Deddf Llywodraeth Leol 1972, fel y'i newidiwyd gan Orchymyn Llywodraeth Leol

(Cymru) 2007 (Mynediad at Wybodaeth) (Amrywio).

 

Os, yn dilyn cymhwyso'r prawf budd y cyhoedd yn yr Is-Bwyllgor yn penderfynu yn unol â'r Ddeddf i ystyried yr eitemau hyn yn breifat, bydd y cyhoedd yn cael eu gwahardd o'r cyfarfod yn ystod ystyriaeth o'r fath.

 

Cofnodion:

Ni fydd yr adroddiadau/cofnodion yn ymwneud â’r eitemau canlynol yn cael eu cyhoeddi gan eu bod yn cynnwys gwybodaeth eithriedig yn ôl y diffiniad ym Mharagraff 12 Rhan 4 ac/neu Baragraff 21 Rhan 5 Atodlen 12A Deddf Llywodraeth Leol 1972 fel y diwygiwyd gan Orchymyn Llywodraeth Leol (Mynediad i Wybodaeth) (Amrywiad) (Cymru) 2007.

 

Os, yn dilyn y cais o brawf lles y cyhoedd fod y Pwyllgor yn penderfynu yn unol â’r Ddeddf i ystyried yr eitemau hyn yn breifat, bydd aelodau’r cyhoedd yn cael eu gwahardd o’r cyfarfod yn ystod yr ystyriaeth honno.

125.

Cymeradwyaeth Cofnodion wedi’u Eithrio

I dderbyn am gymeradwyaeth y Cofnodion eithrio cyfarfod y 18/12/2018

 

Cofnodion:

RESOLVED: That the exempt minutes of the Licensing Sub Committee of the 18th December 2018 be approved as a true and accurate record.

126.

Ceisiadau i Gymeradwyo Trwyddedau

Cofnodion:

Quintin Verity

39 Tremgarth

Bridgend

 

The applicant was in attendance

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services asked the applicant if he had a copy of the report, the applicant confirmed this. He was then asked if the details were correct to which he also confirmed.

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services asked if he had received any convictions, penalties or ongoing matters since the report to which he replied no.

 

The Committee was informed by the Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services of the offenses which were listed in the report and asked the applicant if he could provide his account of each of the offenses, starting with the first one dated 12/08/2015 for failing to stop after an accident.

 

The applicant explained that while driving he encountered road works which he did not expect to be there. He said that was unable to stop conveniently and wanted to get out of the way of oncoming traffic as he believed he would have been causing an obstruction. He reversed to allow space for the oncoming traffic and while doing so, hit a driver behind him. The applicant stated that he intended to stop to resolve the incident. He explained that he drove on further up the road so he could turn around. Once he arrived back at the incident, the other driver involved had already left the scene.

 

The Legal Officer asked the applicant how he came about being charged for the incident. The applicant explained that he was contacted by the police shortly after but believed he was unable to provide his side of the story and was subsequently charged.

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services asked the applicant to give his account of the 2nd conviction SP30: Exceeding statutory speed limit on a public road. The applicant said that he was driving in Cefn Cribwr at the time. He explained that he had a lapse in concentration and went slightly over the speed limit. The Legal Officer asked what speed he was doing at that time, the applicant said that he was not going much over the speed limit and estimated the speed to be around 35mph. In his defence he explained that the particular road he was on, the speed limit changes from 40mph to 30mph.

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services asked the applicant to give his account of the 3rd conviction SP30: Exceeding statutory speed limit on a public road. The applicant explained that similar to the previously mentioned conviction, he had a lapse in concentration and went slightly over the speed limit. He was asked by the Legal Officer where this took place and if he why the fine for this offence was less than his previous as they are usually a fixed penalty of £100. The applicant said he was unsure of where the 2nd offense took place. He also said that he was unsure why the fine was only £40 as opposed to the fixed penalty amount of £100.

 

Members had  ...  Gweld y cofnodion lawn ar gyfer eitem 126.

127.

Gwrandawiad Disgyblu ar gyfer Gyrwyr Tacsi Presennol

Cofnodion:

Paul Ernest Bovingdon

Grithill Cottage

Ffordd Yr Eglwys

North Cornelly

Bridgend

 

The applicant was not in attendance as he was away from the area due to work commitments. 

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services informed the Sub-Committee that the applicant had been made aware of the meeting and sufficient time had been allowed or the applicant to make arrangements to attend.

 

The Sub-Committee proceeded with the disciplinary hearing in the absence of Mr Bovingdon.

 

The Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services gave the Members background to the situation and details surrounding the disciplinary for Mr Bovingdon. He explained that the applicant was due a renewal of his Disclosure and Barring Service check, a number of calls and emails had been made to him requesting him to send in an up to date DBS certificate. The applicant had explained to the Licensing Team earlier in the process that he had sent off for a new copy but did not receive it. The applicant had been requested on two separate occasions on 22nd October and 10th December 2018 but had not yet provided a new copy of his DBS.

 

The Sub Committee retired to consider the application, upon return it was

 

RESOLVED: That the Sub-Committee heard from the Operational Manager Shared Regulatory Services that Mr Bovingdon was working away therefore unable to attend the meeting but had been given notice of the hearing and had also been advised that the Sub-Committee could decide to adjourn the hearing or hear the matter in his absence.  The Sub-Committee has determined that as Mr Bovingdon was given notice of the hearing and been advised of the consequences if he failed to attend, the Sub-Committee determined that they will proceed to hear the application.

 

The Sub-Committee has considered the report by the Licensing Officer in relation to the applicant’s failure to produce a DBS certificate when requested to do so by the Licensing Authority.

 

The Sub-Committee heard evidence from the Licensing Officer that Mr Bovingdon has not provided his DBS certificate despite being requested to do so by letters dated the 22nd October 2018 and again on 10th December 2018.  Mr Bovingdon gave the reason for nonproduction was that the original copy had not been received, however, arrangements were made for a further copy to be sent.  Unfortunately Mr Bovingdon still failed to provide his DBS certificate.

 

The Sub-Committee did not have confidence that Mr Bovingdon can corroborate his statement on his application in relation to convictions.

 

The Sub-Committee found that they were not satisfied that Mr Bovingdon was a fit and proper person as he had not produced a satisfactory DBS and on that basis decided to revoke the licence. 

 

11:29 finished.

 

Chwilio A i Y

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z