Minutes:
Council received the following Motion:
Council notes:
The Notice of Motion and the following information provided by the Members in support of their notice of motion in accordance with Part 4 Rules of Procedure of the Council’s Constitution:
Council believes that:
Council resolves to:
Councillor Reeves in proposing the Motion stated that the Trade Union Movement is the largest voluntary group in the UK. The Bill requires any ballot on strike action to have a turnout of at least 50% and then a 50% majority in favour for it to be valid, for what are designated ‘important public services’ the rules would be even more draconian, 80% of those entitled to vote would have to vote for industrial action, however the request from unions for online voting has been rejected. Councillor Reeves stated that this was from a Government that was elected by a simple majority for each seat. She believed that the Bill is an attack on civil liberties, attacking the democratic right to protest, with Picketing supervisors and plans including social media having to be declared in advance. Employer would have to be informed 2 weeks in advance of any action to be taken, such as strike action, or even if a union intended to post anything on Facebook, or carry a loudhailer or banner. The proposed Trade Union Bill has been compared to ‘like something from a Franco-style dictatorship’ by a Tory MP. The bill also includes the withdrawal of checkoff, the payment of union subs from salary. She stated that the PCS union having to devote resources having to be used on Direct Debit campaigns instead of proper union work, protecting and promoting the rights of workers.
She stated that political funds were also under attack, with an opt-in rather than opt-out as is currently in place, which will attack the funding of political campaigns and political parties. Added to this is the threat of substantial fines of up to £20,000 at every stage.
The withdrawal of labour, the right to strike, is a basic human right, which any union considers to be a last resort, this bill is an attack on this basic right, it will pitch worker against worker by allowing agency workers to be brought in as strike-breakers. It attacks the rights of ordinary workers across the country and puts the interests of big business ahead of the employee. This is at a time when strike action is at an all-time low.
Councillor Reeves urged Council support the motion.
In seconding the Motion, Councillor Spanswick stated that looking back over the past 5 years it had becoming increasingly worrying to see how pay and in-work benefits have been attacked by those in power, with people’s attitudes being influenced by the press and thus making people less tolerant of one another. In the last parliament the Liberal Democrats supported the Conservatives’ introduction of the bedroom tax, the abandoning of the Independent Living Fund for disabled people, the introduction of the £1,200 tribunal charges and an increase to two years before workers get employment protection. He stated that these are a few examples of people being worse off now than before the coalition government came to power in 2010.
Councillor Spanswick informed Council that the proposals the subject of the Motion were all-out attack on trade unions and workers’ rights with the proposed Trade Union Bill. The Bill aims to stop trade unions from acting collectively and influencing political decision making. It will make it almost impossible to strike by placing unreasonable thresholds on ballots, which do not apply to the election of M.P.’s
He stated that the Bill proposed to cut facility time for workplace reps in the public sector and to remove ‘check off’ facilities whereby the union membership fee is deducted directly from an employees pay. There is a penalty or fine of £42,000 for having more than seven pickets or for not wearing an official armband on a picket line. This all amounted to an attack upon the only organisation able to protect workers in the workplace, and to stop them from funding the Labour Party. He stated that this was a blatant attempt to take away all opposition to the removal of rights of hard won trade unionists of the past century.
Councillor Spanswick stated that if implemented this new law would take away any incentive for the employer to reach agreements with their workforce or the unions that represent them, and gives employers powers such as the right to hire agency workers to replace workers who are on strike and was totally unacceptable in the 21st century.
Councillor Spanswick stated that it was now time for trade unionists and the British public to open their eyes and to fight back on proposals which are an attack on living in a tolerant society. He requested that Council urge the Government to abandon this Bill and make a commitment to work in partnership with the Trade Union movement to achieve a fairer society.
Councillor R L Thomas informed Council that he was pleased to support the Motion and stated that the Bill placed great emphasis on unions securing large percentage turnouts to call strikes and the rejection by the Government of online voting for industrial action. He stated that the proposals represent an attack on workplace protestations which could lead to links being lost to workers and human rights. He wholeheartedly supported the Notice of Motion.
Councillor Watts in proposing an amendment stated that the Bill was about protecting essential public services against strikes and also about preventing the minority holding the majority of employees to ransom in calling industrial action thereby disrupting public services. He also stated that there are greater numbers of working people are not union members. He questioned how this Council’s relationship with union would be affected.
Councillor Watts proposed an amendment that the first bullet point in the proposed resolution be deleted “Oppose the introduction of the Trade Union Bill 2015” and that this Council resolves to “Write to the Conservative Government to make a commitment to work in partnership with the Trade Union movement to achieve a fair society”.
Councillor Clarke seconded the amendment.
A recorded Vote was taken at this point in the meeting, as a request had been made, which was duly seconded, to receive recorded votes on the Notice of Motion and the amendment to the Notice of Motion.
The recorded vote was as follows:
FOR Against Abstain Did Not Vote
Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor
R Young
CJ James
M Thomas
DK Edwards
AD Owen
R Williams
JR McCarthy
DBF White
N Farr
RM James
DG Owen
DR Pugh
DRW Lewis
JE Lewis
P James
EM Hughes
G Phillips
GW Davies MBE
HE Morgan
PA Davies
EP Foley
E Dodd
S Aspey
G Davies
M Jones
C Westwood
M Reeves
R Thomas
C Reeves
JC Spanswick
LC Morgan
N Clarke
KJ Watts
PJ White
HJ Townsend
HJ David
MEJ Nott OBE
M Gregory
CE Smith
HM Williams
32 0 0 0
A vote was taken on the amendment to the Notion of Motion proposed by Councillor KJ Watts and seconded by Councillor N Clarke.
The vote was as follows:
FOR Against Abstain Did Not Vote
Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor
G Davies R Young DG Owen
N Clarke M Thomas S Aspey
KJ Watts DK Edwards
R Williams
JR McCarthy
DR Pugh
DRW Lewis
JE Lewis
EM Hughes
G Phillips
GW Davies MBE
HE Morgan
PA Davies
EP Foley
E Dodd
M Jones
C Westwood
M Reeves
RL Thomas
C Reeves
JC Spanswick
LC Morgan
PJ White
HJ Townsend
HJ David
MEJ Nott OBE
M Gregory
CE Smith
HM Williams
3 29 2 0
As a result of the vote the amendment to the Notice of Motion failed.
Councillor C Reeves was given the right of reply as the proposer of the Notice of Motion stating that employees taking industrial action is the ultimate sanction and that the culture of Trade Unions had changed a great deal from the past.
A vote was taken on the Notice of Motion proposed by Councillor C Reeves and seconded by Councillor JC Spanswick.
The vote was as follows:
FOR Against Abstain Did Not Vote
Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor
R Young G Davies DG Owen N Clarke
M Thomas KJ Watts S Aspey
DK Edwards
R Williams
JR McCarthy
DR Pugh
DRW Lewis
EM Hughes
G Phillips
GW Davies MBE
HE Morgan
PA Davies
EP Foley
E Dodd
M Jones
C Westwood
M Reeves
RL Thomas
C Reeves
JC Spanswick
LC Morgan
PJ White
HJ Townsend
HJ David
MEJ Nott OBE
M Gregory
CE Smith
HM Williams
29 2 2 1
As a result of the vote the Notice of Motion was carried.
RESOLVED: That Council:
· Oppose the introduction of the Trade Union Bill 2015;
· Write to urge the Conservative Government to abandon this Bill and make a commitment to work in partnership with the Trade Union movement to achieve a fairer society.
Supporting documents: